Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

["Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great idea! 

 

 

 

Sincerely,

Rich Cooper

EnglishLogicKernel.com

Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com

 

 

---

From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Duane Nickull
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:57 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

 

John:
On 3/21/09 1:30 PM, "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Duane and Dick,

DN> Having studied Google since day 1, I have found that they do
 > offer rudimentary disambiguation where terms may have a plurality
 > of meanings.

Yes, I realize that they have been using some rudimentary semantics.
But it is not yet at the level of the kinds of semantics we have
been discussing in the forum.

It just occurred to me that we have never had a Google speaker on this forum.  I wonder if we should reach out to Google and find out if they have any interested in participating within this forum.  It seems to me a perfect place where they should be.

And I agree with you that their semantics is rudimentary, especially by the standards on this list.

D

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)