Re: [ontolog-forum] Requirements of computer language semantics

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>]

John:
On 3/21/09 1:30 PM, "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Duane and Dick,
>
> DN> Having studied Google since day 1, I have found that they do
>  > offer rudimentary disambiguation where terms may have a plurality
>  > of meanings.
>
> Yes, I realize that they have been using some rudimentary semantics.
> But it is not yet at the level of the kinds of semantics we have
> been discussing in the forum.

It just occurred to me that we have never had a Google speaker on this forum.  I wonder if we should reach out to Google and find out if they have any interested in participating within this forum.  It seems to me a perfect place where they should be.

And I agree with you that their semantics is rudimentary, especially by the standards on this list.

D 



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)