|To:||edbark@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||"Adrian Walker" <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:10:02 -0400|
The problem seems to lie in two areas:
- How much axiomatization is enough to be 'widely useful'?
- Useful to whom?
While it's tempting to break the task into
One way to do this is in a Wiki for executable content. Items [1,2] below represent one such approach.
Some degree of support for executable natural language would seem to be essential to get productive cooperation among the stakeholders.
What do you think?
Cheers, -- Adrian
 Internet Business Logic
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English over SQL and RDF
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Ed Barkmeyer <edbark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re:ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce], Godfrey Rust|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re:ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce], Christopher Spottiswoode|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re:ANN: GoodRelations - The Web Ontology for E-Commerce], Ed Barkmeyer|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|