To: | Avril Styrman <Avril.Styrman@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Cc: | standard-upper-ontology@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:13:43 -0600 |
Message-id: | <p06230902c3c6b35c993a@[192.168.1.2]> |
At 11:28 PM +0200 1/30/08, Avril Styrman wrote:
Nonsense. This is the idea of Gödel numbering: the things that are to be proved have to be used in their own proof. Apparently you know very little about formal arithmetic or
Goedel's theorem.
a. 1+1=2 is provable in any formal arithmetic.
b. "the things that are to be proved have to be used in
their own proof" is not the idea of Goedel
numbering
c. Goedel's result has nothing at all to do with circularity in
proofs.
It is fine to be ignorant about a topic, of course, but to vent
your opinions in an authoritative way when you are so ignorant only
exhibits your ignorance to others. It is not persuasive.
Pat Hayes
Avril -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC 40 South Alcaniz St. Pensacola FL 32502 phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology, Pat Hayes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology, Pat Hayes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology, Avril Styrman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Axiomatic ontology, Rob Freeman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |