John, (01)
John F. Sowa wrote:
<snip>
> > After reading the first part that concerns paradoxes of
> > nominalism, one can hardly be a nominalist anymore.
>
> After reading Peirce, one can hardly be a nominalist anymore.
>
>
So, were you a nominalist when you read Peirce and converted or was
Peirce confirmation/affirmation of what you already thought to be true? (02)
Just curious. (03)
Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend! (04)
Patrick (05)
--
Patrick Durusau
patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300) (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|