[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Observation on one Result of Success Re: Presentatio

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:35:48 -0500
Message-id: <20071024123548.GA5630@xxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:16:18AM +0700, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> not just that though
> You know I am a 100 percent supporter of the good work done by this
> group
> Let's admit it - there are some double standards.     (01)

Let's not.    (02)

> From time to time, list contributors get reprimanded for referencing
> their own work 'if it's not open content'.
> Fair enough.
> From time to time, one of the list convenors or their friends
> reference their own 'not open content' work, and get invited to give
> a talk about it instead.    (03)

I myself have *no idea* what you are talking about.  The list conveners
seem to me to have been entirely even-handed in their choice of
presenters and exceedingly careful to distinguish events involving
proprietary content (which IIRC were *requested* by forum participants)
from others.    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>