ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] vague wish lists VS formal specifications

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Deborah MacPherson" <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:46:53 -0500
Message-id: <48f213f30702231246t20d2074mbf9598c7813dd3cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Pat -    (01)

Mutual construction of a concept map sounds good and yes the customer,
even if right, does not always know what the best options are.    (02)

Does every concept map need to start from scratch? Are there models
maintained anywhere to start part way through the process. A template
if you will for - a school, a military organization, an organization
under another organization, an organization in the United States,
organizations in many countries? Does each scenario start on a blank
sheet of paper? Or rather, in a software program?    (03)

Debbie    (04)

On 2/23/07, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
> >  > [Deborah McPherson]
> >  > With a checklist to follow, untrained customers will be better
> >  > prepared and able to state what their needs are and organize their
> >>  resources to provide ontology engineers, programmers, and formal
> >>  specification writers with what THEY need to get the data to flow in
> >>  potentially customized, atypical manners.
> >
> >MW: I disagree. My experience is that you need to take what the
> >customer says they need, and perform analysis to determine what they
> >really need.
>
> A quick note: our experience here (at IHMC) on expert knowledge
> extraction bears this out, in spades. There is an entire field
> devoted to techniques for discovering what customers/experts actually
> know and want, as opposed to what they think they know and want. (In
> case this idea offends, bear in mind that it applies to the people
> doing the analysis just as much as to everyone else.)
>
> For the record, our KE mavens (I am not one of them) tell me that one
> of the most efficient such analysis techniques involves collaborative
> construction of a concept map, which is one reason we have developed
> so much software around this apparently trivial notion.
>
> Pat Hayes
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC            (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                        (850)291 0667    cell
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>    (05)


--     (06)

*************************************************    (07)

Deborah MacPherson
www.accuracyandaesthetics.com
www.deborahmacpherson.com    (08)

The content of this email may contain private
confidential information. Do not forward, copy,
share, or otherwise distribute without explicit
written permission from all correspondents.    (09)

**************************************************    (010)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>