[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] ACTION REQUESTED: OntologyBrowser

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:33:04 -0800
Message-id: <45DAA430.4020604@xxxxxxxx>
Thank you, Duane.    (01)

One caveat ...    (02)

Before making a post to the wiki, please do check to make sure 
the user licensing arrangement of your tools are indeed 
consistent with the Ontolog IPR Policy 
(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32 ).
I would suggest that poster also mention which Free (Libre) or 
Open Source License is applicable when they post.    (03)

A review of my recent post on a similar issue (ref: 
) may be helpful.    (04)

While it is ok (even when your software is not open sourced) to 
respond to a solicitation for information on the mailing list 
(forum) with a brief message for the requesting party to go to 
your website or follow-up with you offline, please make sure your 
software licensing arrangement is consistent with our IPR policy 
before cataloging it on our wiki.    (05)

If there is any question, please feel free to e-mail me (offline) 
for clarification.    (06)

Thanks & regards.  =ppy
--    (07)

Duane Nickull wrote Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:50:49 -0800:
> This question has been asked before.  We actually have a tools section on
> the wiki:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid2A
> I would like to ask for all those who responded with advice to please
> consider updating or adding information to this area where appropriate.
> This knowledge should be captured.
> Duane    (08)

> On 2/16/07 6:00 AM, "Rex Brooks" <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Chandu,
>> When you use the word "any" you are asking for a
>> lot and I expect that the relative lack of
>> response may be attributed to that. However, if
>> you ask for "most" ontologies, then there are
>> several candidates, among which I would say
>> Protégé is probably one of the best.
>> Regards,
>> Rex    (09)

>> At 4:23 PM +0530 2/16/07, chandu wrote:
>>> Is there any generic ontology browser which can
>>> load any ontology and allow us to browse
>>> through? any project going on? Or is it that
>>> browser depends on the ontology itself and cant
>>> be independent of ontology?
>>> --
>>> "Dream as if you'll live forever;
>>> Live as if you'll die today."    (010)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>