[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] CCTONT work progress

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 07:25:13 -0700
Message-id: <417FAFC9.20504@xxxxxxx>
Adam Pease wrote:    (01)

> Folks,
>   I've posted a new version of the CCTrep.kif file, and mappings from 
> SUMO to the CCT, linked at the top of the page 
> <http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation>.  Comment 
> welcome.
> Adam    (02)

mm1: Adam, in reviewing this I see good work but wonder about the 
associations / assumptions that have been made [1]. For example:    (03)

    * Code. Type: SymbolicString - This is not about brevity. It is
      about a consistent mechanism to type information in order to
      provide a baseline for representation.  May need further review.
    * DateTime: time - Insufficient to provide a date because many
      applications use the date time for deadlines - not 24 hours, but
    * Measure Unit. Code: ConstantQuantity - You have to drill down to
      understand the semantic association [2].
    * Agency: Agent - An agency is not an individual but a grouping
      mechanism for an authority (that may be comprised of people). [2]    (04)

Thanks.    (05)

[1] I've only copied you as I've not had time to follow this in any detail.
[2] I have some hesitation to say some of these associations of natural 
language and CCT fit. My concern lies in that 0...n CCT may be 
associated with this natural language and you lose the specificity of 
that typing mechanism in that association. Perhaps you can provide more 
details so I understand the reasoning better.    (06)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>