[ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not share
or forward message without consent from the team! *** ] (01)
Sounds great. (02)
K Goodier (03)
On Apr 18, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Ken Baclawski <kenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (04)
>
> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please
> do not share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, K Goodier wrote:
>
>>
>> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please
>> do not share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>>
>> Since I am I'm DC I could save you the trip.
>
> Thanks for the offer. I go down to DC from time to time anyway, so it
> need not be a separate trip for me. Perhaps we could arrange for a
> f2f
> with both of us present?
>
>> Of course I know there are few grants and lots of proposals, but the
>> game around the beltway typically benefits those who go the extra
>> mile
>> to do the f2f. I have won many millions in the non-grant part of this
>> game, but I certainly bow to your expertise on the grant side of this
>> fence.
>
> The DataNet program arranged at least one meeting/workshop for
> prospective
> applicants. Unfortunately, we were too late to attend one.
>
> -- Ken
>
>>
>> K Goodier
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Ken Baclawski <kenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please
>>> do not share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>>>
>>> I could go to DC and speak with the PM F2F, but it would be best if
>>> I had
>>> a better idea of how we can deal with the issues we know about
>>> already.
>>>
>>> Generally speaking, the scores, even for a single reviewer, reflect
>>> all of
>>> the review criteria. To merit an overall score of "Excellent", one
>>> must be
>>> excellent on every criteron. In other words, we can't expect a
>>> weakness
>>> with respect to one of the review criteria to be counteracted by
>>> strength
>>> on another criterion. Remember that there are a lot of proposals
>>> and only
>>> a few grants.
>>>
>>> -- Ken
>>>
>>>> Sometimes you get some better ideas about the comments if you ask
>>>> for a
>>>> face-to-face feedback review. I was concerned that we only rated
>>>> one
>>>> "Very Good"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
>>> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
>> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601 (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601 (06)
|