oor-nsf07601
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oor-nsf07601] NSF Proposal was not accepted

To: oor-nsf07601 <oor-nsf07601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ken Baclawski <kenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904171731490.13897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not share 
or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]    (01)

I could go to DC and speak with the PM F2F, but it would be best if I had 
a better idea of how we can deal with the issues we know about already.    (02)

Generally speaking, the scores, even for a single reviewer, reflect all of 
the review criteria. To merit an overall score of "Excellent", one must be 
excellent on every criteron.  In other words, we can't expect a weakness 
with respect to one of the review criteria to be counteracted by strength 
on another criterion.  Remember that there are a lot of proposals and only 
a few grants.    (03)

-- Ken    (04)

> Sometimes you get some better ideas about the comments if you ask for a 
> face-to-face feedback review.  I was concerned that we only rated one 
> "Very Good"    (05)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/ 
Wiki: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>