oor-nsf07601
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oor-nsf07601] NSF Proposal was not accepted

To: oor-nsf07601 <oor-nsf07601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:58:07 -0700
Message-id: <af8f58ac0904171758y37a1d50r237c460c7cd666fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not share 
or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]    (01)

Leo,    (02)

I'll forward the info to you again ... look out for a message under
subject line: oor-nsf07601 workspace access
For those who also forgot look for that msg
dated from me Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:41 AM PDT
(or ask me to re-forward you the msg.)    (03)

Regards.  =ppy
--    (04)


On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Obrst, Leo J. <lobrst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not 
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>
> Sorry, folks, but I don't recall the login: can anyone help out? Could 
>encrypt and sign for better protection.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
> _____________________________________________
> Dr. Leo Obrst           The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics
> lobrst@xxxxxxxxx        Information Discovery & Understanding, Command & 
>Control Center
> Voice: 703-983-6770     7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305
> Fax: 703-983-1379       McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA    (05)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oor-nsf07601-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:oor-nsf07601-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Baclawski
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:44 PM
> To: oor-nsf07601
> Subject: Re: [oor-nsf07601] NSF Proposal was not accepted
>
>
> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not 
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>
> I could go to DC and speak with the PM F2F, but it would be best if I had
> a better idea of how we can deal with the issues we know about already.
>
> Generally speaking, the scores, even for a single reviewer, reflect all of
> the review criteria. To merit an overall score of "Excellent", one must be
> excellent on every criteron.  In other words, we can't expect a weakness
> with respect to one of the review criteria to be counteracted by strength
> on another criterion.  Remember that there are a lot of proposals and only
> a few grants.
>
> -- Ken
>
>> Sometimes you get some better ideas about the comments if you ask for a
>> face-to-face feedback review.  I was concerned that we only rated one
>> "Very Good"
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
> Wiki: 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
> Wiki: 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>    (06)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/ 
Wiki: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>