[ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not share
or forward message without consent from the team! *** ] (01)
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, K Goodier wrote: (02)
>
> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please do not
>share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>
> Since I am I'm DC I could save you the trip. (03)
Thanks for the offer. I go down to DC from time to time anyway, so it
need not be a separate trip for me. Perhaps we could arrange for a f2f
with both of us present? (04)
> Of course I know there are few grants and lots of proposals, but the
> game around the beltway typically benefits those who go the extra mile
> to do the f2f. I have won many millions in the non-grant part of this
> game, but I certainly bow to your expertise on the grant side of this
> fence. (05)
The DataNet program arranged at least one meeting/workshop for prospective
applicants. Unfortunately, we were too late to attend one. (06)
-- Ken (07)
>
> K Goodier
>
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Ken Baclawski <kenb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> [ *** This list is for use by the OOR nsf-07061 team only - please
>> do not share or forward message without consent from the team! *** ]
>>
>> I could go to DC and speak with the PM F2F, but it would be best if
>> I had
>> a better idea of how we can deal with the issues we know about
>> already.
>>
>> Generally speaking, the scores, even for a single reviewer, reflect
>> all of
>> the review criteria. To merit an overall score of "Excellent", one
>> must be
>> excellent on every criteron. In other words, we can't expect a
>> weakness
>> with respect to one of the review criteria to be counteracted by
>> strength
>> on another criterion. Remember that there are a lot of proposals
>> and only
>> a few grants.
>>
>> -- Ken
>>
>>> Sometimes you get some better ideas about the comments if you ask
>>> for a
>>> face-to-face feedback review. I was concerned that we only rated one
>>> "Very Good"
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
>> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
> Wiki:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601
> (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-nsf07601/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/community/project/OOR/nsf07601/
Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_Proposal/Nsf_07601 (09)
|