Dear Peter, (01)
do you mean Tue 2013.09.03?
Then I am in Warsaw at a conference. Not sure whether I will be able to
participate, but maybe if suffices if Aleksandra and Oliver can. (02)
Best, Till (03)
Am 24.07.2013 21:05, schrieb Peter Yim:
> Dear Till & Aleksandra,
>
> Thank you. We can discuss this a bit more at our next OOR Team
> (admin/planning) conference call, which is scheduled for Tue
> 2013.09.02. Let's remember to include this into the agenda for that
> meeting.
>
> Thanks & regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Till Mossakowski
> <Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>> this is a good idea!
>> In particular, the meta ontology could be refined at various places, but
>> this should only be done at those places where there are real ontologies
>> that wait for classification...
>>
>> Best, Till
>
>
>> Am 23.07.2013 18:53, schrieb Peter Yim:
>>
>>> Nice work! Thank you, Till & Aleksandra.
>>>
>>> Now that we have a good "starting point," we probably should devote a
>>> session (say, a Joint Session with interested collaborators), in the
>>> not-too-distant future, to discuss where to go, from here, and get
>>> input from the broader community.
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>>> --
>
>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Till Mossakowski
>>> <Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> Aleksandra Sojic has created a first version of the meta ontology, see
>>>> https://github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/blob/master/Domain_fields.owl
>>>> -
>>>> use "raw" for downloading and viewing with Protégé:
>>>> https://raw.github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/master/Domain_fields.owl
>>>>
>>>> This ontology provides a meta-classification that according to the domain
>>>> subjects distributes domain-ontologies into the domain-specific classes.
>>>> As
>>>> the reference classification we have considered several international
>>>> standards which are used to classify domain fields. The International
>>>> Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) has been selected as the
>>>> most
>>>> appropriate reference for the specification of the (subject) categories
>>>> within the OntoHub. ISCED is a member of the United Nations International
>>>> Family of Economic and Social Classifications and is the reference
>>>> classification for organizing education programmes and related
>>>> qualifications by levels and fields of education (ref. ISCED). In
>>>> particular, we have used the last version of ISCED (the final draft
>>>> published in June 2013) as it provides a hierarchy of knowledge domains
>>>> suitable for covering comprehensively the corresponding
>>>> ontology-modelling
>>>> fields.
>>>>
>>>> The Domain-fields-ontology has to be developed further in order to
>>>> include
>>>> several other specifications, especially considering the domains which
>>>> experience a significant expansion in the ontology development, e.g. Life
>>>> Sciences.
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached a graphical visualisation of the recently published
>>>> Domain-fields ontology.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Till
>
>
>>>> Am 29.05.2013 21:30, schrieb matthew lange:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We aren't taking the lead
>>>>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not)
>>>>> does
>>>>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Watching this thread, and interested as well...do you have a reference
>>>>> for who is heading this up?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Ray Fergerson
>>>>> <ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oliver,
>>>>>
>>>>> Worth pointing out is that we (the NCBO team) don't feel that the
>>>>> current
>>>>> BioPortal categorization is very good. It should probably not be
>>>>> used
>>>>> as
>>>>> the basis for anything. There are external efforts to produce a
>>>>> categorization system for the biomedical domain. We aren't taking
>>>>> the lead
>>>>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not)
>>>>> does
>>>>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ray
>
>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> [mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Till
>>>>> Mossakowski
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:14 AM
>>>>> To: oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Oliver Kutz
>>>>> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] Categories for ontologies
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> the interesting question is then: what happens if we federate
>>>>> BioPortal
>>>>> with SOCoP? We need a taxonomy including all the involved
>>>>> categories, such
>>>>> that in the ontology browser, all the BioPortal categories are
>>>>> combined
>>>>> into one category "biology" (which can be expanded into the
>>>>> BioPortal
>>>>> categories on demand).
>>>>>
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 29.05.2013 08:53, schrieb Till Mossakowski:
>>>>> > Am 29.05.2013 00:29, schrieb John F Sowa:
>>>>> >> On 5/28/2013 4:27 PM, Till Mossakowski wrote:
>>>>> >>> After all, the user wants to use *one* ontology or
>>>>> classification
>>>>> >>> system for classifying ontologies.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> What do you mean "one classification system"?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In BioPortal, when the user uploads a new ontology, (s)he can
>>>>> provide
>>>>> > some categories classifying the ontology. When browsing all
>>>>> > ontologies, you can also filter them by category.
>>>>> > The possible categories are: Animal Development, Biological
>>>>> Process,
>>>>> > Human, Plant, Yeast, Cell etc. (Btw, not all categories returned
>>>>> by
>>>>> > the REST service can be selected for browsing.) The OOR instance
>>>>> > http://mercury-ncbo.ornl.gov seems to (erroneously) use the same
>>>>> > categories In the OOR instance http://socop.oor.net, the
>>>>> categories
>>>>> > are (exhaustive
>>>>> > list): Commercial, Cultural, Defense, Financial, Geospatial,
>>>>> > Government, Literature, Metadata, Other, Process, Provenance,
>>>>> Science,
>>>>> > Social Networking, Standards, Technology, Upper Ontologies.
>>>>> > I now just wonder what we should do for Ontohub.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> The number of different kinds of ontologies, their purposes,
>>>>> goals,
>>>>> >> applications, levels, logics, notations, uses, etc., is
>>>>> open-ended.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Suppose that somebody asked you to compare Cyc to BFO to the
>>>>> Good
>>>>> >> Relations ontology to schema.org <http://schema.org>. Where
>>>>>
>>>>> would you begin? And why?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It is not about comparing ontologies. It is just that the
>>>>> "filter
>>>>> by
>>>>> > category" dropdown box on the browsing web page needs to show a
>>>>> finite
>>>>> > list of options to the user...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best, Till
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone
>>>>> +49-421-218-64226 <tel:%2B49-421-218-64226>
>>>>>
>>>>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax
>>>>> +49-421-218-9864226
>>>>> <tel:%2B49-421-218-9864226>
>>>>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>>>>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>>>>> principal
>>>>> office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>>>>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern management board:
>>>>> Prof.
>>>>> Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff supervisory board:
>>>>> Prof.
>>>>> Hans A. Aukes (chair) Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>>>> Wiki:
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>>>> Wiki:
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>>>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
>>>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
>>>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>>>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>>>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>>>
>>>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>>>> principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>>>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>>>> management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
>>>> supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
>>>> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>
>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>> principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>> management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
>> supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
>> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 (04)
--
Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/ (05)
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|