Dear Peter, (01)
this is a good idea!
In particular, the meta ontology could be refined at various places, but
this should only be done at those places where there are real ontologies
that wait for classification... (02)
Best, Till (03)
Am 23.07.2013 18:53, schrieb Peter Yim:
> Nice work! Thank you, Till & Aleksandra.
>
> Now that we have a good "starting point," we probably should devote a
> session (say, a Joint Session with interested collaborators), in the
> not-too-distant future, to discuss where to go, from here, and get
> input from the broader community.
>
> Thanks & regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Till Mossakowski
> <Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Aleksandra Sojic has created a first version of the meta ontology, see
>> https://github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/blob/master/Domain_fields.owl -
>> use "raw" for downloading and viewing with Protégé:
>> https://raw.github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/master/Domain_fields.owl
>>
>> This ontology provides a meta-classification that according to the domain
>> subjects distributes domain-ontologies into the domain-specific classes. As
>> the reference classification we have considered several international
>> standards which are used to classify domain fields. The International
>> Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) has been selected as the most
>> appropriate reference for the specification of the (subject) categories
>> within the OntoHub. ISCED is a member of the United Nations International
>> Family of Economic and Social Classifications and is the reference
>> classification for organizing education programmes and related
>> qualifications by levels and fields of education (ref. ISCED). In
>> particular, we have used the last version of ISCED (the final draft
>> published in June 2013) as it provides a hierarchy of knowledge domains
>> suitable for covering comprehensively the corresponding ontology-modelling
>> fields.
>>
>> The Domain-fields-ontology has to be developed further in order to include
>> several other specifications, especially considering the domains which
>> experience a significant expansion in the ontology development, e.g. Life
>> Sciences.
>>
>> Please find attached a graphical visualisation of the recently published
>> Domain-fields ontology.
>>
>> Best, Till
>
>
>> Am 29.05.2013 21:30, schrieb matthew lange:
>>>
>>> We aren't taking the lead
>>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not) does
>>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>>
>>> Watching this thread, and interested as well...do you have a reference
>>> for who is heading this up?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Ray Fergerson
>>> <ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oliver,
>>>
>>> Worth pointing out is that we (the NCBO team) don't feel that the
>>> current
>>> BioPortal categorization is very good. It should probably not be used
>>> as
>>> the basis for anything. There are external efforts to produce a
>>> categorization system for the biomedical domain. We aren't taking
>>> the lead
>>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not) does
>>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Till
>>> Mossakowski
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:14 AM
>>> To: oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Oliver Kutz
>>> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] Categories for ontologies
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>>
>>> the interesting question is then: what happens if we federate
>>> BioPortal
>>> with SOCoP? We need a taxonomy including all the involved
>>> categories, such
>>> that in the ontology browser, all the BioPortal categories are
>>> combined
>>> into one category "biology" (which can be expanded into the BioPortal
>>> categories on demand).
>>>
>>> Till
>>>
>>> Am 29.05.2013 08:53, schrieb Till Mossakowski:
>>> > Am 29.05.2013 00:29, schrieb John F Sowa:
>>> >> On 5/28/2013 4:27 PM, Till Mossakowski wrote:
>>> >>> After all, the user wants to use *one* ontology or classification
>>> >>> system for classifying ontologies.
>>> >>
>>> >> What do you mean "one classification system"?
>>> >
>>> > In BioPortal, when the user uploads a new ontology, (s)he can
>>> provide
>>> > some categories classifying the ontology. When browsing all
>>> > ontologies, you can also filter them by category.
>>> > The possible categories are: Animal Development, Biological
>>> Process,
>>> > Human, Plant, Yeast, Cell etc. (Btw, not all categories returned by
>>> > the REST service can be selected for browsing.) The OOR instance
>>> > http://mercury-ncbo.ornl.gov seems to (erroneously) use the same
>>> > categories In the OOR instance http://socop.oor.net, the categories
>>> > are (exhaustive
>>> > list): Commercial, Cultural, Defense, Financial, Geospatial,
>>> > Government, Literature, Metadata, Other, Process, Provenance,
>>> Science,
>>> > Social Networking, Standards, Technology, Upper Ontologies.
>>> > I now just wonder what we should do for Ontohub.
>>> >
>>> >> The number of different kinds of ontologies, their purposes,
>>> goals,
>>> >> applications, levels, logics, notations, uses, etc., is
>>> open-ended.
>>> >>
>>> >> Suppose that somebody asked you to compare Cyc to BFO to the Good
>>> >> Relations ontology to schema.org <http://schema.org>. Where
>>>
>>> would you begin? And why?
>>> >
>>> > It is not about comparing ontologies. It is just that the "filter
>>> by
>>> > category" dropdown box on the browsing web page needs to show a
>>> finite
>>> > list of options to the user...
>>> >
>>> > Best, Till
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone
>>> +49-421-218-64226 <tel:%2B49-421-218-64226>
>>>
>>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
>>> <tel:%2B49-421-218-9864226>
>>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>>
>>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>>> principal
>>> office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern management board: Prof.
>>> Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff supervisory board: Prof.
>>> Hans A. Aukes (chair) Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>
>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>> principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>> management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
>> supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
>> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>> (04)
--
Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/ (05)
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (07)
|