Nice work! Thank you, Till & Aleksandra. (01)
Now that we have a good "starting point," we probably should devote a
session (say, a Joint Session with interested collaborators), in the
not-too-distant future, to discuss where to go, from here, and get
input from the broader community. (02)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (03)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Till Mossakowski
<Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Aleksandra Sojic has created a first version of the meta ontology, see
> https://github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/blob/master/Domain_fields.owl -
> use "raw" for downloading and viewing with Protégé:
> https://raw.github.com/ontohub/OOR_Ontohub_API/master/Domain_fields.owl
>
> This ontology provides a meta-classification that according to the domain
> subjects distributes domain-ontologies into the domain-specific classes. As
> the reference classification we have considered several international
> standards which are used to classify domain fields. The International
> Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) has been selected as the most
> appropriate reference for the specification of the (subject) categories
> within the OntoHub. ISCED is a member of the United Nations International
> Family of Economic and Social Classifications and is the reference
> classification for organizing education programmes and related
> qualifications by levels and fields of education (ref. ISCED). In
> particular, we have used the last version of ISCED (the final draft
> published in June 2013) as it provides a hierarchy of knowledge domains
> suitable for covering comprehensively the corresponding ontology-modelling
> fields.
>
> The Domain-fields-ontology has to be developed further in order to include
> several other specifications, especially considering the domains which
> experience a significant expansion in the ontology development, e.g. Life
> Sciences.
>
> Please find attached a graphical visualisation of the recently published
> Domain-fields ontology.
>
> Best, Till (04)
> Am 29.05.2013 21:30, schrieb matthew lange:
>>
>> We aren't taking the lead
>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not) does
>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>
>> Watching this thread, and interested as well...do you have a reference
>> for who is heading this up?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Ray Fergerson
>> <ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ray.fergerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Oliver,
>>
>> Worth pointing out is that we (the NCBO team) don't feel that the
>> current
>> BioPortal categorization is very good. It should probably not be used
>> as
>> the basis for anything. There are external efforts to produce a
>> categorization system for the biomedical domain. We aren't taking
>> the lead
>> in this categorization effort but if a standard (defacto or not) does
>> arise we would be interested in adapting our system to use it.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Till
>> Mossakowski
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 12:14 AM
>> To: oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Oliver Kutz
>> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] Categories for ontologies
>>
>> P.S.
>>
>> the interesting question is then: what happens if we federate
>> BioPortal
>> with SOCoP? We need a taxonomy including all the involved
>> categories, such
>> that in the ontology browser, all the BioPortal categories are
>> combined
>> into one category "biology" (which can be expanded into the BioPortal
>> categories on demand).
>>
>> Till
>>
>> Am 29.05.2013 08:53, schrieb Till Mossakowski:
>> > Am 29.05.2013 00:29, schrieb John F Sowa:
>> >> On 5/28/2013 4:27 PM, Till Mossakowski wrote:
>> >>> After all, the user wants to use *one* ontology or classification
>> >>> system for classifying ontologies.
>> >>
>> >> What do you mean "one classification system"?
>> >
>> > In BioPortal, when the user uploads a new ontology, (s)he can
>> provide
>> > some categories classifying the ontology. When browsing all
>> > ontologies, you can also filter them by category.
>> > The possible categories are: Animal Development, Biological
>> Process,
>> > Human, Plant, Yeast, Cell etc. (Btw, not all categories returned by
>> > the REST service can be selected for browsing.) The OOR instance
>> > http://mercury-ncbo.ornl.gov seems to (erroneously) use the same
>> > categories In the OOR instance http://socop.oor.net, the categories
>> > are (exhaustive
>> > list): Commercial, Cultural, Defense, Financial, Geospatial,
>> > Government, Literature, Metadata, Other, Process, Provenance,
>> Science,
>> > Social Networking, Standards, Technology, Upper Ontologies.
>> > I now just wonder what we should do for Ontohub.
>> >
>> >> The number of different kinds of ontologies, their purposes,
>> goals,
>> >> applications, levels, logics, notations, uses, etc., is
>> open-ended.
>> >>
>> >> Suppose that somebody asked you to compare Cyc to BFO to the Good
>> >> Relations ontology to schema.org <http://schema.org>. Where
>>
>> would you begin? And why?
>> >
>> > It is not about comparing ontologies. It is just that the "filter
>> by
>> > category" dropdown box on the browsing web page needs to show a
>> finite
>> > list of options to the user...
>> >
>> > Best, Till
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone
>> +49-421-218-64226 <tel:%2B49-421-218-64226>
>>
>> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
>> <tel:%2B49-421-218-9864226>
>> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
>> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>>
>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
>> principal
>> office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
>> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern management board: Prof.
>> Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff supervisory board: Prof.
>> Hans A. Aukes (chair) Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Config/Unsubscribe:
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
>> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
>> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>>
>
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. Till Mossakowski Cartesium, room 2.51 Phone +49-421-218-64226
> DFKI GmbH Bremen Fax +49-421-218-9864226
> Cyber-Physical Systems Till.Mossakowski@xxxxxxx
> Enrique-Schmidt-Str. 5, D-28359 Bremen
> http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~till/
>
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
> principal office, *not* the address for mail etc.!!!:
> Trippstadter Str. 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
> management board: Prof. Wolfgang Wahlster (chair), Dr. Walter Olthoff
> supervisory board: Prof. Hans A. Aukes (chair)
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (06)
|