Re: [ontology-summit] The tools are not the problem (yet)

[John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/23/2014 10:43 AM, Krzysztof Janowicz wrote:
> Your 'is' proposal is a good example. I am not saying that you should
> take your 'issues elsewhere' just that namespaces are not linguistic
> expressions and that this is the reason why an 'is' namespace would most
> likely be rejected by the community.
I never said lingusitic I said syntactic. Please stop changing my words.    (01)

On 1/23/2014 9:42 AM, John McClure wrote:
> I am using syntactic structures to connote
> important semantic information.    (02)


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (03)