Hi Krzysztof,
How would you define "Big Data" then? I don't recall such done yet
for the purposes of the communique.
As for two camps, I am referring to front-end and back-end
enterprise processes that use, evidently, different ontologies.
Finally, I did not say RDF is flawed. I said
the way RDF properties are defined, is flawed: it is out of step
with what FOL'ers want.
Thanks for the reply/jmc
On 1/21/2014 10:12 PM, Krzysztof
Janowicz wrote:
Hi,
What is Big Data if not FOL'ers work? Who are Semantic Webbers and
LOD'ers if not RDF'ers?
I am having trouble seeing the connection between Big Data and First
Order Logic.
My point was that we should not tell people apart by assigning them to
certain camps but focus on the commonalities and how to continue our
joint mission.
I am also not sure whether I would call a technology that is at the core
of the gigantic cloud of Linked Data 'fatally flawed'. Even more, I do
not see the point of making such statements at all if the goal of the
summit is to bring different groups together.
Best,
Krzysztof
On 01/21/2014 09:55 PM, John McClure wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
What is Big Data if not FOL'ers work? Who are Semantic Webbers and
LOD'ers if not RDF'ers?
I agree it can be reworded to be nice and positive, but the message is
the same. As someone said "Never apologize for what you think. It's like
saying sorry for being real.
<http://www.searchquotes.com/quotation/Never_apologize_for_what_you_feel._It%27s_like_saying_sorry_for_being_real./262537/>
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/l/lesterbpe170256.html>
Read more at
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/blunt.html#X17sPSdUR1BIc7SK.99
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/l/lesterbpe170256.html>
Read more at
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/blunt.html#X17sPSdUR1BIc7SK.99
" But when we've got an environment in which the FOL'ers discount the
work product of their brethren, then we're got a problem, Houston, which
relates to the critical intersection of these two groups of ontology
producers & consumers.
regards/jmc
On 1/21/2014 9:29 PM, Krzysztof Janowicz wrote:
Dear John,
Accordingly I believe that Ontolog's 2014 communique should be extremely
clear: the current W3 RDF methodology for property specification is
fatally flawed and must be aligned with FOL'ers requirements.
from what I recall this year's summit is named 'Big Data and Semantic
Web Meet Applied Ontology'. Statements like the one above are for sure
the very best way to alienate most Semantic Webbers and Linked Data
researchers.
Best,
Krzysztof
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
|
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|