ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] The tools are not the problem (yet)

To: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:55:25 -0800
Message-id: <52DF5D4D.8030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Krzysztof,

What is Big Data if not FOL'ers work? Who are Semantic Webbers and LOD'ers if not RDF'ers?

I agree it can be reworded to be nice and positive, but the message is the same. As someone said "Never apologize for what you think. It's like saying sorry for being real. " But when we've got an environment in which the FOL'ers discount the work product of their brethren, then we're got a problem, Houston, which relates to the critical intersection of these two groups of ontology producers & consumers.

regards/jmc

On 1/21/2014 9:29 PM, Krzysztof Janowicz wrote:
Dear John,

Accordingly I believe that Ontolog's 2014 communique should be extremely
clear: the current W3 RDF methodology for property specification is
fatally flawed and must be aligned with FOL'ers requirements.
from what I recall this year's summit is named 'Big Data and Semantic 
Web Meet Applied Ontology'. Statements like the one above are for sure 
the very best way to alienate most Semantic Webbers and Linked Data 
researchers.

Best,
Krzysztof




_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>