To: | Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Michael F Uschold <uschold@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:37:47 -0700 |
Message-id: | <BANLkTin83bDRymbE5AAhvm8sXh+=ogZOvw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
WHen you say "your systems all have ontologies anyway" do you mean the implicit views of the world that were in people's head when they designed the systems? If so, then 1) I agree. and 2) this is not how we are using the word ontology in this forum.
I like the idea though, I think we could find the right wording and make it work. Michael
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Mike Bennett <mbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Or to put this another way, your systems all have ontologies -- Michael Uschold, PhD Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2011: Communique draft review session - Thu 2011.04.07., Michael F Uschold |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2011: Communique draft review session - Thu 2011.04.07., Ali Hashemi |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2011: Communique draft review session - Thu 2011.04.07., Mike Bennett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Summit 2011: Communique draft review session - Thu 2011.04.07., Ali Hashemi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |