ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontology-summit] RE: [ontology-summit] Re: 回复: [ontology-summit] Progre

To: Ontology Summit 2009 <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Olken, Frank" <folken@xxxxxxx>, Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx>, Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>, Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@xxxxxxxx>, Rob Raskin <raskin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gunther Schadow <gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Chute, Christopher G., M.D., Dr. P.H." <chute@xxxxxxxx>, David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Benson <Peter.Benson@xxxxxxxxx>, Elisa Kendall <ekendall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Edward Barkmeyer <edbark@xxxxxxxx>, Simon Frechette <simon.frechette@xxxxxxxx>, Mark Carlisle <carlisle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "MacPherson, Deborah" <dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:58:13 -0400
Message-id: <43F2A07F08761449ABD2C0664C74D9FC128AA06FDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am very interested in the results of this effort. I'll help where I can with 
the units of measure used in the architecture and construction domain.  
    (01)

Deborah MacPherson
    (02)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Yim
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:38 PM
To: Olken, Frank; Ontology Summit 2009; Forest Lin; Patrick Cassidy; Duane 
Nickull; Conrad Bock; Rob Raskin; Gunther Schadow; Chute, Christopher G., M.D., 
Dr. P.H.; David Price; Peter Benson; Elisa Kendall; Edward Barkmeyer; Simon 
Frechette; Mark Carlisle
Subject: [ontology-summit] Re: 回复: [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units 
Ontology - virtual session
    (03)

Folks,
    (04)

We are now two weeks from Thu 2009.06.11 ... and time to take inventory again.
    (05)

I am writing to ping everyone, one more time, to find out:
    (06)

1. who is interesting to participate in getting the said Units of Measure 
ontology effort going.
2. who is willing to provide some level of leadership to get this effort off 
the ground.
3. who would be joining us if we do run a virtual panel session on this on Thu 
2009.06.11 4. if you are joining, and would like to be a panelist, please 
provide a title and an abstract of what you might share with in in a 10~15 
minute brief.
5. besides PatCassidy, who else has (access to) a UoM related ontology, that 
he/she can upload to the OOR sandbox and some other publicly accessible 
ontology repository? (if the latter, please advise where the repository is.)
    (07)

Let's wait till end-of-day Tuesday June-2 for everyone's response.
Depending on the responses, we'll decide how to move forward with this.
Do respond NOW (to this thread), please, if you can!
    (08)


Thanks & regards.  =ppy
--
    (09)


2009/5/19 Olken, Frank <folken@xxxxxxx>:
> Peter,

>

> I am still interested, but still busy running NSF review panels.

> June 10-11, 2009 is (I hope) my last panel of the fiscal year.

>

>         Frank Olken

>

> National Science Foundation

> Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate 

> Intelligent Information Systems Division Information Integration and 

> Informatics Program Suite 1125

> 4201 Wilson Blvd.

> Arlington, VA 22230

>

> Tel:      703-292-8930 (main)

> Tel:      703-292-7350 (direct)

> Email:    folken@xxxxxxx

> Twitter:  http://twitter.com/frankolken
    (010)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 

> Peter Yim

> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:23 PM

> To: Ontology Summit 2009; Forest Lin; Patrick Cassidy; Duane Nickull; 

> Conrad Bock; Rob Raskin; Olken, Frank; Gunther Schadow; Chute, 

> Christopher G., M.D., Dr. P.H.; David Price; Peter Benson; Elisa 

> Kendall; Edward Barkmeyer

> Cc: Steve Ray; Peter Yim

> Subject: Re: 回复: [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units Ontology - 

> virtual session

>

> All,

>

> Since only 3 people indicated they could be available to do the 

> session this Thursday (May-21 ... but, luckily, they are also 

> available for Jun-11), I'll assume that's not quite making critical 

> mass. Let's decide to drop this Thursday, and pursue the Thursday

> Jun-11 date for the session instead. This would give everyone a bit 

> more time to respond and to get prepared. Unless we hear major 

> objections to this date, let's lock that date in, and move on to 

> getting the right people and content prepared.

>

> Once again, would you be able to join us for the session on

> 11-Jun-2009 - 2 Hrs starting Thu 2009.06.11 - 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT 

> / 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm BST / 17:30 UTC

>

> I've added a couple more people (ElisaKendall and EdBarkmeyer) to the 

> initial list. Will everyone please also advise who else should be 

> involved, please indicate. So, unless you've already indicated your 

> availability, please advise if you can join us on Jun-11 [attn: PatC, 

> Duane, Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, ChrisC, David, PeterB, 

> Elisa, EdB] ... we need your presence and support if we were to embark 

> on an ontology as important as this!

>

> Thanks & regards.  =ppy

> --
    (011)


> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I am afraid I can not participate in the forthcoming discussion. But 

>> I'd like to know the progress.

>> Thank you and all for pushing it forward.

>>

>> Regards,

>> ..Lin
    (012)


> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM,  <david.leal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Peter,

>>

>> I hope to join on Thursday.

>>

>> Best regards,

>> David
    (013)


> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>wrote:

>> I can participate this Thursday and/or on June 11.

>>

>> I'm actually at an ISO TC184 SC4 STEP meeting this week so the timing 

>> is perfect. I'll mention it to David Leal who will likely want to 

>> participate as well.

>>

>>

>> Peter, thanks for pushing this forward!

>>

>> Cheers,

>> David
    (014)


> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I will be available this Thursday, and probably June 11th also.

>>

>> One additional 'units' work: Helena Pinto reviewed the units portion 

>> of the SUMO and published a paper (attached so you don't have to track it 
>down).

>>

>> Pat

>>

>> Patrick Cassidy

>> MICRA, Inc.

>> 908-561-3416

>> cell: 908-565-4053

>> cassidy@xxxxxxxxx
    (015)


>> ________________________________
>> From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>

>> To: Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx>; Duane Nickull 

>> <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>; Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@xxxxxxxx>; Rob Raskin 

>> <raskin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Olken, Frank" <folken@xxxxxxx>; Gunther 

>> Schadow <gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
>"Chute, Christopher G., M.D., Dr.

>> P.H." <chute@xxxxxxxx>; David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter 

>> Benson <Peter.Benson@xxxxxxxxx>

>> cc: Ontology Summit 2009 <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve 

>> Ray <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>

>> Date: Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM PDT

>> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units Ontology - virtual 

>> session

>>

>>> [PC] Any other unit ontologies we should consider?

>>

>>> [DN] I?e been searching but have not yet found any.

>>

>> [ppy]  I thought Conrad Bock (NIST) gave posted a very comprehensive 

>> list - see:

>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2009-05/msg00032.html

>>

>> Additionally (although, not expressed in an ontology language yet) 

>> are the UCUM (Unified Code for Units of Measure) - see:

>> http://unitsofmeasure.org/

>> & http://www.regenstrief.org/medinformatics/ucum - which were brought 

>> up (offline) by ForestLin, GuntherSchadow and ChrisChute during the 

>> course of the OntologySummit2009 discussion.

>>

>>

>> On a separate note ...

>>

>> David Price suggested

>> (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2009_05_14#ni

>> d1XOU

>> ) we do a virtual session to discuss the Units of Measure ontology 

>> stuff some time soon. This Thursday's meeting slot (Thu 2009.05.21

>> 1.5~2 Hrs. starting 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT / 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm 

>> BST / 17:30 UTC) is open. (If not,  the next open Thursday slot is

>> June-11 ... or we will have to choose a non-Thursday to do it.)

>>

>> Let's do a quick poll ... for the 10 people directly addressed (in

>> "To:") on this message, who could/would join us if do it the session 

>> this Thursday? (kindly respond today ... so we can lock the time in, 

>> and have people starting working on preparing for the session.) Also, 

>> if we do it on Jun-11, would you be able to join? [attn: Pat, Duane, 

>> Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, Chris, David, Peter]

>>

>> Others who are planning to join, and have some thoughts on dates are 

>> welcome to chime in.

>>

>>

>> Thanks & regards.  =ppy

>> --

>
    (016)

_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009 
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>