Frank, looking forward to reading your article in the PWC report
(01)
Sent from my iPhone
(02)
On May 29, 2009, at 10:03 AM, "Chum, Frank Y" <FChum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(03)
> I am interested in this effort. Would like to participate and
> submit an abstract for the UOM upper ontology.
>
> Thanks,
> Frank Chum
> Enterprise Architect - Emerging Technologies
> Technology Management & Architecture
> Chevron Information Technology Company
> 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon, CA 94583-2324
> Fchum at chevron dot com
>
> WARNING. This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or
> previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain confidential
> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in
> or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
> have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify
> the sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments
> without reading them. Thank you.
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ] On Behalf Of Peter Yim
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:38 PM
> To: Olken, Frank; Ontology Summit 2009; Forest Lin; Patrick Cassidy;
> Duane Nickull; Conrad Bock; Rob Raskin; Gunther Schadow; Chute,
> Christopher G., M.D., Dr. P.H.; David Price; Peter Benson; Elisa
> Kendall; Edward Barkmeyer; Simon Frechette; Mark Carlisle
> Subject: [ontology-summit]Re: 回复： [ontology-summit] Progressing
> a Units Ontology - virtual session
>
> Folks,
>
> We are now two weeks from Thu 2009.06.11 ... and time to take
> inventory again.
>
> I am writing to ping everyone, one more time, to find out:
>
> 1. who is interesting to participate in getting the said Units of
> Measure ontology effort going.
> 2. who is willing to provide some level of leadership to get this
> effort off the ground.
> 3. who would be joining us if we do run a virtual panel session on
> this on Thu 2009.06.11
> 4. if you are joining, and would like to be a panelist, please provide
> a title and an abstract of what you might share with in in a 10~15
> minute brief.
> 5. besides PatCassidy, who else has (access to) a UoM related
> ontology, that he/she can upload to the OOR sandbox and some other
> publicly accessible ontology repository? (if the latter, please advise
> where the repository is.)
>
> Let's wait till end-of-day Tuesday June-2 for everyone's response.
> Depending on the responses, we'll decide how to move forward with
> this.
> Do respond NOW (to this thread), please, if you can!
>
>
> Thanks & regards. =ppy
> --
>
>
> 2009/5/19 Olken, Frank <folken@xxxxxxx>:
>> Peter,
>>
>> I am still interested, but still busy running NSF review panels.
>> June 10-11, 2009 is (I hope) my last panel of the fiscal year.
>>
>> Frank Olken
>>
>> National Science Foundation
>> Computer and Information Science and Engineering Directorate
>> Intelligent Information Systems Division
>> Information Integration and Informatics Program
>> Suite 1125
>> 4201 Wilson Blvd.
>> Arlington, VA 22230
>>
>> Tel: 703-292-8930 (main)
>> Tel: 703-292-7350 (direct)
>> Email: folken@xxxxxxx
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/frankolken
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> Peter Yim
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 3:23 PM
>> To: Ontology Summit 2009; Forest Lin; Patrick Cassidy; Duane
>> Nickull; Conrad Bock; Rob Raskin; Olken, Frank; Gunther Schadow;
>> Chute, Christopher G., M.D., Dr. P.H.; David Price; Peter Benson;
>> Elisa Kendall; Edward Barkmeyer
>> Cc: Steve Ray; Peter Yim
>> Subject: Re: 回复： [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units
>> Ontology - virtual session
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Since only 3 people indicated they could be available to do the
>> session this Thursday (May-21 ... but, luckily, they are also
>> available for Jun-11), I'll assume that's not quite making critical
>> mass. Let's decide to drop this Thursday, and pursue the Thursday
>> Jun-11 date for the session instead. This would give everyone a bit
>> more time to respond and to get prepared. Unless we hear major
>> objections to this date, let's lock that date in, and move on to
>> getting the right people and content prepared.
>>
>> Once again, would you be able to join us for the session on
>> 11-Jun-2009 - 2 Hrs starting Thu 2009.06.11 - 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm
>> EDT
>> / 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm BST / 17:30 UTC
>>
>> I've added a couple more people (ElisaKendall and EdBarkmeyer) to the
>> initial list. Will everyone please also advise who else should be
>> involved, please indicate. So, unless you've already indicated your
>> availability, please advise if you can join us on Jun-11 [attn: PatC,
>> Duane, Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, ChrisC, David, PeterB,
>> Elisa, EdB] ... we need your presence and support if we were to
>> embark
>> on an ontology as important as this!
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>> --
>
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Forest Lin
>> <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I am afraid I can not participate in the forthcoming discussion.
>>> But I'd
>>> like to know the progress.
>>> Thank you and all for pushing it forward.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> ..Lin
>
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM, <david.leal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Dear Peter,
>>>
>>> I hope to join on Thursday.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> David
>
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>> I can participate this Thursday and/or on June 11.
>>>
>>> I'm actually at an ISO TC184 SC4 STEP meeting this week so the
>>> timing is
>>> perfect. I'll mention it to David Leal who will likely want to
>>> participate
>>> as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter, thanks for pushing this forward!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> I will be available this Thursday, and probably June 11th also.
>>>
>>> One additional 'units' work: Helena Pinto reviewed the units
>>> portion of the
>>> SUMO and published a paper (attached so you don't have to track it
>>> down).
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>>> Patrick Cassidy
>>> MICRA, Inc.
>>> 908-561-3416
>>> cell: 908-565-4053
>>> cassidy@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
>>> To: Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx>; Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >;
>>> Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@xxxxxxxx>; Rob Raskin
>>> <raskin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> "Olken, Frank" <folken@xxxxxxx>; Gunther Schadow <gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >;
>>> Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Chute, Christopher G.,
>>> M.D., Dr.
>>> P.H." <chute@xxxxxxxx>; David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>>> Peter Benson
>>> <Peter.Benson@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> cc: Ontology Summit 2009 <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve
>>> Ray
>>> <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM PDT
>>> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units Ontology -
>>> virtual session
>>>
>>>> [PC] Any other unit ontologies we should consider?
>>>
>>>> [DN] I抳e been searching but have not yet found any.
>>>
>>> [ppy] I thought Conrad Bock (NIST) gave posted a very comprehensive
>>> list - see:
>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2009-05/msg00032.html
>>>
>>> Additionally (although, not expressed in an ontology language yet)
>>> are
>>> the UCUM (Unified Code for Units of Measure) - see:
>>> http://unitsofmeasure.org/
>>> & http://www.regenstrief.org/medinformatics/ucum - which were
>>> brought
>>> up (offline) by ForestLin, GuntherSchadow and ChrisChute during the
>>> course of the OntologySummit2009 discussion.
>>>
>>>
>>> On a separate note ...
>>>
>>> David Price suggested
>>> (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2009_05_14#nid1XOU
>>> ) we do a virtual session to discuss the Units of Measure ontology
>>> stuff some time soon. This Thursday's meeting slot (Thu 2009.05.21
>>> 1.5~2 Hrs. starting 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT / 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm
>>> BST / 17:30 UTC) is open. (If not, the next open Thursday slot is
>>> June-11 ... or we will have to choose a non-Thursday to do it.)
>>>
>>> Let's do a quick poll ... for the 10 people directly addressed (in
>>> "To:") on this message, who could/would join us if do it the session
>>> this Thursday? (kindly respond today ... so we can lock the time in,
>>> and have people starting working on preparing for the session.)
>>> Also,
>>> if we do it on Jun-11, would you be able to join? [attn: Pat, Duane,
>>> Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, Chris, David, Peter]
>>>
>>> Others who are planning to join, and have some thoughts on dates are
>>> welcome to chime in.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>>> --
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
(04)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (05)
|