All, (01)
Since only 3 people indicated they could be available to do the
session this Thursday (May-21 ... but, luckily, they are also
available for Jun-11), I'll assume that's not quite making critical
mass. Let's decide to drop this Thursday, and pursue the Thursday
Jun-11 date for the session instead. This would give everyone a bit
more time to respond and to get prepared. Unless we hear major
objections to this date, let's lock that date in, and move on to
getting the right people and content prepared. (02)
Once again, would you be able to join us for the session on
11-Jun-2009 - 2 Hrs starting Thu 2009.06.11 - 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT
/ 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm BST / 17:30 UTC (03)
I've added a couple more people (ElisaKendall and EdBarkmeyer) to the
initial list. Will everyone please also advise who else should be
involved, please indicate. So, unless you've already indicated your
availability, please advise if you can join us on Jun-11 [attn: PatC,
Duane, Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, ChrisC, David, PeterB,
Elisa, EdB] ... we need your presence and support if we were to embark
on an ontology as important as this! (04)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (05)
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am afraid I can not participate in the forthcoming discussion. But I'd
> like to know the progress.
> Thank you and all for pushing it forward.
>
> Regards,
> ..Lin (06)
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:10 AM, <david.leal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> I hope to join on Thursday.
>
> Best regards,
> David (07)
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:50 AM, David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can participate this Thursday and/or on June 11.
>
> I'm actually at an ISO TC184 SC4 STEP meeting this week so the timing is
> perfect. I'll mention it to David Leal who will likely want to participate
> as well.
>
>
> Peter, thanks for pushing this forward!
>
> Cheers,
> David (08)
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I will be available this Thursday, and probably June 11th also.
>
> One additional 'units' work: Helena Pinto reviewed the units portion of the
> SUMO and published a paper (attached so you don't have to track it down).
>
> Pat
>
> Patrick Cassidy
> MICRA, Inc.
> 908-561-3416
> cell: 908-565-4053
> cassidy@xxxxxxxxx (09)
> ________________________________
> From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Patrick Cassidy <pat@xxxxxxxxx>; Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@xxxxxxxx>; Rob Raskin <raskin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> "Olken, Frank" <folken@xxxxxxx>; Gunther Schadow <gschadow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Forest Lin <linforests@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Chute, Christopher G., M.D., Dr.
> P.H." <chute@xxxxxxxx>; David Price <david.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Benson
> <Peter.Benson@xxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Ontology Summit 2009 <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Steve Ray
> <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:51 AM PDT
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Progressing a Units Ontology - virtual session
>
>> [PC] Any other unit ontologies we should consider?
>
>> [DN] I?e been searching but have not yet found any.
>
> [ppy] I thought Conrad Bock (NIST) gave posted a very comprehensive
> list - see:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2009-05/msg00032.html
>
> Additionally (although, not expressed in an ontology language yet) are
> the UCUM (Unified Code for Units of Measure) - see:
> http://unitsofmeasure.org/
> & http://www.regenstrief.org/medinformatics/ucum - which were brought
> up (offline) by ForestLin, GuntherSchadow and ChrisChute during the
> course of the OntologySummit2009 discussion.
>
>
> On a separate note ...
>
> David Price suggested
> (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2009_05_14#nid1XOU
> ) we do a virtual session to discuss the Units of Measure ontology
> stuff some time soon. This Thursday's meeting slot (Thu 2009.05.21
> 1.5~2 Hrs. starting 10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT / 7:30pm CEST / 6:30pm
> BST / 17:30 UTC) is open. (If not, the next open Thursday slot is
> June-11 ... or we will have to choose a non-Thursday to do it.)
>
> Let's do a quick poll ... for the 10 people directly addressed (in
> "To:") on this message, who could/would join us if do it the session
> this Thursday? (kindly respond today ... so we can lock the time in,
> and have people starting working on preparing for the session.) Also,
> if we do it on Jun-11, would you be able to join? [attn: Pat, Duane,
> Conrad, Rob, Frank, Gunther, Forest, Chris, David, Peter]
>
> Others who are planning to join, and have some thoughts on dates are
> welcome to chime in.
>
>
> Thanks & regards. =ppy
> -- (010)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (01)
|