ontology-summit-advisors
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit-advisors] Plea for filling out the surveys

To: OntologySummit2010 Advisory Committee <ontology-summit-advisors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kathryn B Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:30:58 -0500
Message-id: <76D393FF-6CE5-40FB-AFB0-D1737AEED32D@xxxxxxx>
On the education survey, it asked if my institution had an ontology  
program or ontology-related courses.  The next question asked what  
academic program offered the ontology-related courses.  It did not  
seem possible on that survey, to say that more than one department or  
academic program offered ontology-related courses.  This seems to be a  
serious shortcoming of the survey.    (01)

Kathy    (02)

On Feb 13, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Peter Yim wrote:    (03)

> Matthew,
>
>
>> [MW]  [The questions] seemed to me to have a somewhat grandiose and
>> unrealistic view of what ontology is and its place in the wider  
>> world.
>
> [ppy]  ... Not trying to be defensive here, but thanks for providing
> the chance to explain why we had this 3rd set - the Real-Time Delphi
> Study on the Future of Ontologists, their Education and the Field of
> Ontology
>
> As described under:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010_Survey#nid28DS
> In this set, "being practical" wasn't part of the intent. While no one
> can really predict the future, a collective vision of "those who
> should know better" might just help us get a glimpse of what is in
> store for us in the future.
>
> As Alan Kay put it: "The best way to predict the future is to invent
> it."  ... we are hoping that each of us here (as members of the expert
> panel in this RTDelphi study) can put our visionary hat on for a
> little bit, and share what future they *are* trying to invent for this
> field ... and, the collection of those thoughts may converge (or
> polarized, or whatever, ... we don't know until we are able to collect
> the thoughts) and should, at the least, be interesting to this
> community.
>
>
>> ... did not think the questions were particularly good.
>
> [ppy]  they weren't supposed to be "questions" as much as they are
> statements to elicit reactions to "developments" of significance. The
> "developments" were essentially culled from an earlier community
> session we had (OntologySummit2010: Panel Session-1) - see:
> 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010_FutureDevelopments_Synthesis#nid25HJ
>
> Please just treat them as the issues that are framing the discussion,
> and the input boxes as the workspaces to which one may post their
> comments (in lieu of making mailing list posts to specific threads.)
>
>
> Thank you for your input. Really appreciate it. Do consider going in
> again, to review your responses and others' as they start to
> accumulate, and possibly tweak your opinion (as you deem fit) any time
> before the close of the study.
>
>
> Thanks & regards.  =ppy
>
> P.S.  apologies for the user interface (which, recognizably, has room
> for improvement) ... but it's the content (and not the form) that is
> important.  =ppy
> --
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Matthew West <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx 
> > wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>
>> Well I’ve had a go at the Delphi Questionnaire. I’m glad I waited  
>> for others
>> to find and point out the issues filling it in.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also have to say that I did not think the questions were  
>> particularly
>> good. They seemed to me to have a somewhat grandiose and  
>> unrealistic view of
>> what ontology is and its place in the wider world.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthew West
>>
>> Information  Junction
>> Tel: +44 560 302 3685
>> Mobile: +44 750 3385279
>> matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
>> http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>>
>>
>>
>> This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in  
>> England
>> and Wales No. 6632177.
>>
>> Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
>> Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.
>
>
>> From: ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On  
>> Behalf Of
>> Steve Ray
>> Sent: 12 February 2010 19:30
>> To: ontology-summit-advisors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ontology-summit-advisors] Plea for filling out the surveys
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>                 We are sending this email to request that you  
>> please respond
>> to the surveys that we have set up to support the Ontology Summit  
>> 2010. We
>> are depending on the full participation of the advisory committee  
>> so that we
>> have a valid set of requirements and training resources, in order  
>> to produce
>> a quality recommendation by the end of the Summit. You have been  
>> invited to
>> be on the advisory committee specifically because we believe you have
>> valuable insight on these matters, either on the requirements side,  
>> or on
>> the training side, or sometimes both.
>>
>>                 We recognize how busy you all are, and appreciate  
>> your
>> taking just a little of it on the surveys. The Real-time Delphi  
>> survey in
>> particular is designed so that you can check back and see other  
>> responses
>> between now and the closing (February 22nd) and update your own  
>> should you
>> choose to do so – more like an asynchronous expert panel than a  
>> survey.
>>
>>
>>
>> The questionnaires can be found at
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010_Survey
>>
>>
>>
>> We thank you for your participation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven R. Ray and Barry Smith, Co-Chairs
>>
>> Ontology Summit 2010
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Committee Msg Archives:
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/
>> Subscriber Config:
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
>> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/ 
>> OntologySummit2010/
>> Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology- 
>> summit/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>>
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Committee Msg Archives: 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Subscriber Config: 
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
> Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>    (04)


_________________________________________________________________
Committee Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/     (05)

Subscriber Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/  
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/ 
Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010 
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (06)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>