Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as

[Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>]

"is a sub property of" is a sub property of "is a specialization of".

On Jun 12, 2014 8:10 PM, "Frank Guerino" <Frank.Guerino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Simon,

So, how would this read, "in English"?  What would the "in English" examples look like of a Predicate binding two other Predicates (one as the source and another as the object), together?

Thanks,

Frank

--
Frank Guerino, Chairman
The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
http://www.if4it.com
1.908.294.5191 (M)

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:18 PM
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes

rdfs:subPropertyOf ?

On Jun 12, 2014 2:05 PM, "Frank Guerino" <Frank.Guerino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Phil,

You wrote: "Will a predicate C be able to link two nodes A and B that may themselves be predicates?"

I can't see (and maybe it's just because I haven't come across a tangible example) where a Predicate can cleanly link two other Predicates together.

As of now, we follow a simple rule that uses basic sentence structure to validate the integrity of the Relationship.  The sentence structure is:

SENTENCE:  "Instance of Subject (or Source) Node" is related as a/an "Predicate/Descriptor" to, of, or for "Instance of Object (or Target) Node".

You can see this in an example the example of the Semantic Relationships for this Application: http://nounz.if4it.com/Nouns/Applications/A_Application_13.SemanticRelationships.html

If you try to use a sentence structure as the validation constraint for the binding of a Source Predicate to a Target Predicate through a Binding/Descriptive Predicate, it becomes hard to create a readable/meaningful sentence.

Would you have any clear examples to prove otherwise?  I'd be very interested in learning about them.

Thanks,

Frank

--
Frank Guerino, Chairman
The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
http://www.if4it.com
1.908.294.5191 (M)

From: Philip Jackson <philipcjacksonjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:30 PM
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes

Will a predicate C be able to link two nodes A and B that may themselves be predicates?
 
It seems like this would be another useful side-effect of making predicates first-class citizens...
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
 

_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)