ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as

To: Frank Guerino <frank.guerino@xxxxxxxxx>, "ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Philip Jackson <philipcjacksonjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:06:25 -0400
Message-id: <SNT147-W8824ED6D03A503005CBE33C12A0@xxxxxxx>
Hi Frank,
 
I asked the question in response to Jack Park's email, in which he suggested a predicate instance could be a verb relating a subject and object, e.g. "X causes Y".  If this can be a first-class entity then it seems another example could be "X says (Y causes Z)", i.e. a predicate C could link two nodes A and B, where A or B may be a predicate, though not necessarily both.
 
Separately, Doug Foxvog and Simon Spero gave examples where both A and B are predicates, linked by a predicate C.
 
However, I was just asking a question, and suggesting this could be useful, not claiming to have a proof of what is or should be supported in the IF4IT standard.
 
Best,
 
Phil

Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:04:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes
From: Frank.Guerino@xxxxxxxxx
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: philipcjacksonjr@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Phil,

You wrote: "Will a predicate C be able to link two nodes A and B that may themselves be predicates?"

I can't see (and maybe it's just because I haven't come across a tangible example) where a Predicate can cleanly link two other Predicates together.

As of now, we follow a simple rule that uses basic sentence structure to validate the integrity of the Relationship.  The sentence structure is:

SENTENCE:  "Instance of Subject (or Source) Node" is related as a/an "Predicate/Descriptor" to, of, or for "Instance of Object (or Target) Node".

You can see this in an example the example of the Semantic Relationships for this Application: http://nounz.if4it.com/Nouns/Applications/A_Application_13.SemanticRelationships.html

If you try to use a sentence structure as the validation constraint for the binding of a Source Predicate to a Target Predicate through a Binding/Descriptive Predicate, it becomes hard to create a readable/meaningful sentence.

Would you have any clear examples to prove otherwise?  I'd be very interested in learning about them.

Thanks,

Frank

--
Frank Guerino, Chairman
The International Foundation for Information Technology (IF4IT)
http://www.if4it.com
1.908.294.5191 (M)





From: Philip Jackson <philipcjacksonjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:30 PM
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Requesting Opinions on the Benefits of Predicates as Nodes

Will a predicate C be able to link two nodes A and B that may themselves be predicates?
 
It seems like this would be another useful side-effect of making predicates first-class citizens...
 


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>