To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:21:09 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CABbsESdJg=6Sd83k8z+7FSn_0XahWQwRcTNT5=JrrrxD=Wg9aQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi All, Good discussion. I'm reminded for the following that Ed Barkmeyer wrote a while ago: What makes written knowledge an "ontology" is that the language has a grammar and an interpretation of the grammatical constructs that is suitable for automated reasoning. If most of the desired reasoning depends on your interpretations of constructs you introduced, that can't happen unless you build the engine. Without that engine, you have an ox, not a bull. HTH, -- Adrian Internet Business Logic Open Apps for Open Data A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Apps written in Executable Open Vocabulary English over SQL and RDF Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements Adrian Walker Reengineering On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] physical context and mental context, Pat Hayes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Objectivist Context vs. Cognitive Science, Gary Berg-Cross |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] physical context and mental context, Pat Hayes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] physical context and mental context, Richard H. McCullough |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |