Here is yet another anecdotal evidence atom that
the way we individually see the world biases our
interpretations of it: (01)
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-beliefs-attitudes.htm
l (02)
Those of us who have been parents know how
effectively the generations are culturally
separated: (03)
http://phys.org/news/2014-01-beliefs-attitudes.htm
l (04)
Mothers, according to the following article form a
deluded belief that their first child is shorter
than they are, and suddenly lose that delusion
when their second child is born: (05)
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-12-mothers-youn
gest-shorter.html#inlRlv (06)
With this much evidence, can we still consider
there to be a universal ontology of any natural
kind, at the top or the bottom of the lattice? (07)
If beliefs (constructed during ontogeny, as a
slice of reality is encountered by an organism
with a slice of the human genome) steer both
perception and logic, then how could a logical
rendering of a snapshot of one person's experience
be anything but dynamically changing? (08)
-Rich (09)
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2 (010)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (011)
|