On 1/22/2014 1:01 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> The problem with RDF is that RDF/XML messed things up, and
> the W3C didn't address this problem in a timely fashion. (01)
I agree -- and so would Tim Bray, the designer of RDF/XML: (02)
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/05/21/RDFNet (03)
Excerpt:
> Speaking only for myself, I have never actually managed to write
> down a chunk of RDF/XML correctly, even when I had the triples
> laid out quite clearly in my head. Furthermore — once again
> speaking for myself — I find most existing RDF/XML entirely
> unreadable. And I think I understand the theory reasonably well. (04)
Tim proposed some changes to RDF, but the W3C did not adopt them. (05)
John (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (07)
|