Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook

[Sjir Nijssen <Sjir.Nijssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

HI Kingsley,

 

To avoid any misunderstanding I have great respect for people that try out new approaches like Virtuoso.

 

 

My +1 was only added after:

“ but we need to clarify things in this forum, not confuse people, or give them false information.” © Leo

Hence it is a matter of the length of the key, one variable or a combination of two form the determinant.

 

I believe it is high time that this community clarifies things wrt ontology.

 

I also have great respect for people that know the history, study the relevant parts and take what is useful and build upon that foundation if applicable; I agree with John that the SW community seems to prefer to ignore what other people have done a long time ago in conceptual modeling. That is why Ontology engineering, in my opinion and experience, is today where computer programming was in the early sixties.

 

Regards

 

Sjir Nijssen

 

Chief Technical Officer

PNA Group

 

Tel:     +31 (0)88-777 0 444

Mob: +31 (0)6-21 510 844

Fax:    +31 (0)88-777 0 499

E-mail: sjir.nijssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-------------------------------------------------------

http://www.pna-group.com

 

Van: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Kingsley Idehen
Verzonden: zondag 20 januari 2013 17:40
Aan: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: Re: [ontolog-forum] Knowledge graphs by Google and Facebook

 

On 1/20/13 10:44 AM, Sjir Nijssen wrote:

KI

> Ask the folks behind that [IBM Watson] project and they will tell you

> how much the LOD cloud contributed to Watson's smarts.

 

Yes, indeed.  They gather up all that data from everywhere, and they store it and process it in -- guess what? -- DB2.  A relational DBMS!

Again, Virtuoso (our product) is a SPARQL and SQL hybrid. Guess what? DB2 is also such a thing i.e., it has added that dimension. Relational DBMS never meant SQL. That's the problem. Relational Database Technology is broad. All Graph, RDBMS, Deductive, or whatever moniker the market puts on them are a kind of Relational Database.

My difference with John is that he is unfairly undermining the current state of art re. Webby Relational Database technology.

Facebook, Google etc.. are leveraging the very things espoused by the Semantic Web vision etc..

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       

Founder & CEO 

OpenLink Software     

Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com

Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen

Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen

Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about

LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)