Le 11/12/2012 19:59, Pat Hayes a écrit :
> On Dec 11, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Richard Dapoigny wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> This debate is very interesting. Let us first put it within the framework of
>computer science letting aside philosophical questions.
>> I think that it is mandatory to introduce first a foundational ontology
> Congratulations to Richard for the fastest act of self-contradiction that I
>have read in many a long year.
>
> Pat Hayes
Ok, the sentence was ill-formed: I had not said that phylosophy has
nothing to do with foundational ontologies since their principles are at
the basis of these ontologies. I just explain that since the question is
about individuals, the focus is on domain ontologies themselves related
to a foundational ontology. Sorry for the misundertanding.
Richard (01)
--
And the wounded skies above say
it's much too much too late.
Well, maybe we should all be praying for time. (02)
richard_dapoigny.vcf
Description: Vcard
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|