| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| From: | William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:16:48 -0500 | 
| Message-id: | <CALuUwtA-9QRmz6O-0z0sNATUjN1m1GK4wFaqYdQ5Z9t8nNROBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| 
 On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Rich Cooper <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
  (...snip) 
 This seems like a category mistake -- two categories of things treated as if they are commensurate -  an ontology is a theory, XML is a language, in which a theory might be expressed.  Compare:  "the vast majority don't get anything extra from number theory that French, (or first order logic, or JSON, ..., or OWL) can't provide."  (snip ...)  _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] doing standards [was - Re: Webby objects], Obrst, Leo J. | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Webby objects, Brand Niemann | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Webby objects, Rich Cooper | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Webby objects, Rich Cooper | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |