ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] How long to useful?

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:22:56 -0700
Message-id: <322959D86A1B4338B537D4E85C3545FC@Gateway>

David and John,

 

John wrote:

Bottom line:  Anybody who claims that ontology will make life simpler has an obligation to demonstrate that simplicity in any tools they develop.

I couldn’t agree more enthusiastically. 

 

Here is a recently released patent I came across that shows how to use multiple taxonomies to traverse multiple databases:

 

http://www.patent2pdf.com/pdf/07778993.pdf

 

Under the hood, it’s complicated, but the interface could, in principle, be much easier to use on web searches over “heterogeneous databases” as the specification describes them.  Whether that patent will be used to produce a simpler-to-use interface fore SMEs, casual users, managers etc remains to be seen. 

 

With that design, the SMEs and other users need not be trained on the official ontologies underneath the various databases – they only have to use the taxonomies to link multiple concepts in different databases. 

 

-Rich

 

Sincerely,

Rich Cooper

EnglishLogicKernel.com

Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com

9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2


From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:24 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] How long to useful?

 

David,

> And I would offer that whatever it is of value you can produce must
> be put into the hands of end-users who have essentially no interest
> at all in ontology. What you've produced—whatever it is—must make
> their job easier...

I agree.  But I would add that this principle applies equally well to everybody involved -- including subject matter experts (SMEs) and application developers.

You can't expect SMEs, such as physicians or geologists, to take a training course in your system before they can use it to do anything useful. 

You can expect programmers to look at a description of the API for your system -- but only if it is written in terms of the programming language they are already using, not in terms of some notation you hope they will learn.

Bottom line:  Anybody who claims that ontology will make life simpler has an obligation to demonstrate that simplicity in any tools they develop.

John


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>