On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. <ontolog@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Rich Cooper
> <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>> Agreed re the FTF vs FTI. The many inventors I
>> know are upset about this new law, and working
>> hard to reverse it, so perhaps that will be
>> changed. But it will take years.
>
> is there an ontology of politicos that are on our side or otherwise
> enemies of invention? is there a tool to work against this yet? (01)
[ppy] I don't know ... but googling "intellectual property ontology"
came up with a whopping 703,000 hits. (02)
Just now, in a totally different conversation[1], Ali Hashemi was
pointing us to work by the EU folks on OWL Ontology of Basic Legal
Concepts (LKIF-Core)[2]. ... Scanning through that quickly, I don't
see much by way of "intellectual property" though. (03)
I guess from the likes Creative Commons would probably know the answer
to your question. ... Anyone else? (04)
Regards. =ppy (05)
References:
[1] ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/2011-10/msg00008.html
[2]
http://www.estrellaproject.org/doc/D1.4-OWL-Ontology-of-Basic-Legal-Concepts.pdf
-- (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (07)
|