ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Interpreting OWL

To: <doug@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:20:18 -0700
Message-id: <20101018032024.A04C4138D20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John, Pavithra, Doug, et al,    (01)

So even in this very practical (and humorous) case of a model someone might
want to construct, even with lots of relations and lots of
<persons/objects/things> designations, as Pavithra states, and we all agree,
that said structure can be fit into an acyclic directed graph of said
<persons/objects/things> so designated?    (02)

Is there any looser constraint, or must the graph be a DAG at all to be
fully distinguishable <persons/objects/things> among the paths?    (03)

Curiously,
-Rich    (04)

Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2    (05)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of doug foxvog
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 8:00 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Interpreting OWL    (06)

On Sun, October 17, 2010 21:41, John F. Sowa said:
> On 10/17/2010 6:21 PM, Rich Cooper wrote:
>> But wouldn't that hierarchy [of professors & grad students]
>> be a lattice instead of a tree?    (07)

It seems to me that the graph would have many disconnected subgraphs,
and certainly not be a single tree.    (08)

> That depends on what relation between prof & students you intend
> to represent.  The relation (X took a course from Y) could have
> cycles.  But the relation (X earned a PhD with Y as thesis advisor)
> would be a tree, except in rather unusual circumstances.    (09)

Consider people who have multiple PhDs in different subjects.
They almost certainly have different thesis advisiors for the
different PhDs.  Such not so common, but not unusual, circumstances
would make the graph no longer a forest.    (010)

The unusual case would be when there was a loop.  This could happen if
a professor were to go for another PhD after a number of years, and
have as a thesis advisor in the new field a former student or even
student of a student.    (011)

-- doug foxvog    (012)

> John    (013)

=============================================================
doug foxvog    doug@xxxxxxxxxx   http://ProgressiveAustin.org    (014)

"I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
    - Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
=============================================================    (015)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (016)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (017)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>