ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] using SKOS for controlled values for controlled voca

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:37:19 -0400
Message-id: <4CB134EF.8070609@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 10/9/2010 9:27 PM, Simon Spero wrote:
> The Broader Term Partitive relationship (BTP) entails that all instances
> of the the class associated with the narrower term must either be in
> some way a part of an instance of the broader term, or their separation
> must be exceptional and require explanation.    (01)

That's an excellent example.  It reflects library practice of
subdividing collections based on the number of shelf-feet of books.
(The terms 'broader' and 'narrower' are literal, not metaphorical.)    (02)

> This is just an approximation; defining the precise entailment is
 > mere ology and is left as an exercise to the reader.    (03)

Every subject has such weird nooks and crannies, and anybody who thinks
that subject X is more precise is guaranteed not to be an expert in X.    (04)

People often use physics as an example of a very precise science.
It's true that some things are precise, but there's a continuum.    (05)

To paraphrase Bismark's principle of laws and sausages, "People
will sleep sounder if they don't see how physicists derive their
theories or engineers apply them."    (06)

John    (07)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>