ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] using SKOS for controlled values for controlled voca

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Obrst, Leo J." <lobrst@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:44:26 -0400
Message-id: <0111C34BD897FD41841D60396F2AD3D304DDC9218C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
John,    (01)

SKOS is a controlled vocabulary language, not an ontology language. You know 
the hazards of inferring a (stronger) subclass relation between two classes or 
classification nodes than the (weaker) lexical relation of narrower-than. SKOS 
was developed to address that, and it's a good thing. A conceptual class in an 
ontology is not the same as a lexical classification node in a thesaurus. OWL 
addresses ontologies; SKOS addresses vocabularies. The former are conceptual, 
the latter are lexical.    (02)

If you obscure the difference, it causes confusion and error. We should not do 
this.    (03)

Leo    (04)

_____________________________________________ 
Dr. Leo Obrst        The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics 
lobrst@xxxxxxxxx     Information Discovery & Understanding, Command & Control 
Center
Voice: 703-983-6770  7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305 
Fax: 703-983-1379    McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA    (05)

      (06)


-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F. Sowa
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 4:00 PM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] using SKOS for controlled values for controlled 
vocabulary    (07)

On 10/8/2010 10:42 AM, Ken Laskey wrote:
> I was surprised that the SKOS examples I found on the Web don't mention
> this.  Am I missing something fundamental?    (08)

SKOS is a small subset of OWL stated in a different notation.    (09)

OWL is a small subset of first-order logic stated in a different notation.    (010)

First-order logic is a small subset of English stated in a different 
notation.    (011)

If you can't state clearly in English exactly what you want to do,
none of those other notations will help you.    (012)

John    (013)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (014)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (015)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>