|From:||Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:50:44 -0800|
On 3/3/10 3:46 PM, "John Bottoms" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
3. Discussions of implementation languages and their constraints
It would be good to maybe start a thread on the aspects you want to talk about. I am sure interested parties (such as myself) will at least read them and also pitch in where appropriate. As a community of practice, I don’t think any concrete discussions around Ontology subjects are discouraged.
If there is an impasse, maybe a good way to start it would be “Assuming <assumptions> are correct, let’s discuss <item of interest>” .
My $0.02 (CAD).
Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise Architecture - http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/
My TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/show/duanes-world/
My Blog – http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
My Band – http://22ndcenturyofficial.com/
Twitter – http://twitter.com/duanechaos
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Foundation ontology, CYC, and Mapping, Kingsley Idehen|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] UML Meta-Model and Notation, John Bottoms|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] UML Meta-Model and Notation, John Bottoms|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] UML Meta-Model and Notation, John Bottoms|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|