Re: [ontolog-forum] UML Meta-Model and Notation

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>]

John:

On 3/3/10 3:46 PM, "John Bottoms" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 3. Discussions of implementation languages and their constraints
>     fog the discussions of functionality. I am not as much concerned
>     about the lack of professional rhetoric as I am professional
>     content.
>
> 4. Form vs function has been discussed extensively in other
>     literature and it is only the first level down in taxonometric
>     entry in an ontology. It looks like working down 3-4-5 layers
>     is NP-I.

It would be good to maybe start a thread on the aspects you want to talk about.  I am sure interested parties (such as myself) will at least read them and also pitch in where appropriate.  As a community of practice, I don’t think any concrete discussions around Ontology subjects are discouraged.

If there is an impasse, maybe a good way to start it would be “Assuming <assumptions> are correct, let’s discuss <item of interest>” . 

My $0.02 (CAD).

Duane

---
Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise Architecture - http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/
My TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/show/duanes-world/
My Blog – http://technoracle.blogspot.com/ 
My Band – http://22ndcenturyofficial.com/ 
Twitter – http://twitter.com/duanechaos



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)