All, please bear with me. There might be others here who
share my views. (01)
1. The 7094 was not the first computer I worked on, it was the 2nd
3rd and 4th. (02)
2. The threads are getting increasingly difficult to follow,
likewise the gratuities. (03)
3. Discussions of implementation languages and their constraints
fog the discussions of functionality. I am not as much concerned
about the lack of professional rhetoric as I am professional
content. (04)
4. Form vs function has been discussed extensively in other
literature and it is only the first level down in taxonometric
entry in an ontology. It looks like working down 3-4-5 layers
is NP-I. (05)
5. Is there a wiki or another tool that could be used to diagram
the discussions? (06)
6. There are many terms being used that have parochial meanings
and which are not found in the classical discussions of
ontologies. Would it be possible to publish a lexicon at a
minimum? Again, this might be work that fits into a wiki. (07)
While I am being critical, it is not my intention to offend. It
just seems like there have been a myriad of emails and little
substantive progress. It seems like time for a meta-discussion. (08)
-John Bottoms
FirstStar Networks
Concord, MA 01742
T: 978-505-9878 (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (010)
|