DN, (01)
Yes, the same thing had occurred to me. Perhaps we could create
threads that had common assumptions. When I look at the discussions
I seem people talking about differing types of intelligence,
differing types of contexts, varying types of memory models and
no concrete processing model which to tie an the ontology. (02)
When LAN's were developing, we used to talk about "islands of
automation". It was a migration strategy that worked until the
great shoot-out of token-passing versus ethernet. That battle came
down to the question of which one was most cost effective (the
token passing implementation took 2 chips, ethernet 1, and so
we voted with our pocketbooks. (03)
Likewise, it seems that implementations of ontological systems
will vote with their pocketbooks; which translates to small workable
systems (implementable) which provide economic benefit. Where are
the "islands of intelligence" that ontologies can provide? Joining
the islands comes after working applications (IMHO). (04)
-John Bottoms (very gray-beard)
FirstStar Networks
Concord, MA
T: 978-505-9878 (05)
Duane Nickull wrote:
> John:
>
> On 3/3/10 3:46 PM, "John Bottoms" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 3. Discussions of implementation languages and their constraints
> fog the discussions of functionality. I am not as much concerned
> about the lack of professional rhetoric as I am professional
> content.
>
> 4. Form vs function has been discussed extensively in other
> literature and it is only the first level down in taxonometric
> entry in an ontology. It looks like working down 3-4-5 layers
> is NP-I.
>
>
> It would be good to maybe start a thread on the aspects you want to talk
> about. I am sure interested parties (such as myself) will at least read
> them and also pitch in where appropriate. As a community of practice, I
> don’t think any concrete discussions around Ontology subjects are
> discouraged.
>
> If there is an impasse, maybe a good way to start it would be “Assuming
> <assumptions> are correct, let’s discuss <item of interest>” .
>
> My $0.02 (CAD).
>
> Duane
>
> ---
> Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise Architecture -
> http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/
> My TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/show/duanes-world/
> My Blog – http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
> My Band – http://22ndcenturyofficial.com/
> Twitter – http://twitter.com/duanechaos
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|