| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| From: | Phani Chaitanya <vsr.phanichaitanya@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:34:07 +0530 |
| Message-id: | <24c45d421001212104v230d17bbs8a5db6d395ca111e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Randall, Thanks for that. Now I get the issue that is addressed by Semantic Web. But I would like to know what does "The idea is to make the semantic content explicit and unambiguous" mean here. I mean, semantic content as in what ?
-- Phani Chaitanya _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Mirror neurons in language use, ravi sharma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax become Semantic ?, Randall R Schulz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax become Semantic ?, Randall R Schulz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax become Semantic ?, Randall R Schulz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |