I came to the party late and missed the early discussions on
how the proposed ontology would be used. So, I went back to
the wiki page and read the charter, which seems to promote an
dialog that will "discuss...identify...[and] promote". But
there is no explicit requirement to create an ontology. (01)
I guess that wouldn't preclude one being developed so since there
has been discussion along those lines and that is not discussed in
the charter, I have to ask if there is a statement of work that
would result in the creation of an ontology, FO, upper ontology
or core vocabulary? (02)
Sorry if this sounds naive, but I had expected the discussion to
return to the SOW by now, but it hasn't. And, if that is the way
we should be moving, then why can't this be solved using word and
expression frequency counts per discipline as has been done
traditionally? (03)
-John Bottoms
First Star
T: 978-505-9878 (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|