To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:52:33 -0700 |
Message-id: | <E1819037BB8A43F9B31A5D7287420111@rhm8200> |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Menzel" <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> >
> So philosophers, logicians, computer scientists, linguists, and > mathematicians since Tarski have all *thought* that what they were > studying under the rubric "formal semantics" was indeed semantics. But > they have in fact all been mistaken; they've only been studying syntax > all along. A remarkable discovery! > > Just for the record, since this is a public forum: You haven't the > slightest idea what you are talking about. > >> Formal semantics looks at the properties of the syntax of a language >> which do not depend on the actual semantics of the language. > > Utter nonsense. > >> That is why I associate syntax with "possible meaning" and semantics >> with "real meaning". > > > Actually, the main problem is with its missing semantics, as explained > to you, patiently, on numerous occasions. > > -chris > As you, John, and Pat continue to say -- you don't
understand what I mean.
So, I will speak of specifics, instead of
abstractions.
Here is a very simple example to illustrate what I
mean.
My reference for "formal semantics" is the IKL
specification document.
Consider the English sentence, "Fido is a
dog."
[The mKR translation is "Fido isu
dog;" ]
The "real symantics" of English [and mKR] tell us
that
a "dog" is a domesticated
carnivious mammal, Canis familiaris
"Fido" is the dog identified by
Napa, CA animal control license # 1234.
The IKL translation of this sentence
is
(and (isu_rel Fido
dog) (dog Fido) (individual
Fido) (property dog))
The "possible semantics" of IKL tell us
that
"dog" is a member of the set of
all possible property names.
"Fido" is a member of the set of
all possible individual names.
"Fido" is an individual which
has the property "dog".
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype, Patrick Cassidy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Last Call: OWL 2 and rdf:text primitive datatype, Matthew West |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] syntax & semantics, Christopher Menzel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] syntax & semantics, Jawit Kien |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |