[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Patrick Cassidy" <pat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:03:46 -0500
Message-id: <09bd01c99058$87926590$96b730b0$@com>
   If there  are any who are interested in actually refining such a
proposal, it might be appropriate to put it on *some* wiki.  The one you
created seems to have a focus on discussing formal standards, with a side
activity of deriding in satirical terms any effort of the kind I have been
discussing.  The proposal I have been discussing is not aimed, in the first
instance, at creating a formal standard, but at creating an FO that is in
fact used by a broad community of application developers.  If it proves
useful, it may in time be incorporated into a formal standard.  You seem to
have missed the point of the whole discussion related to the consortium
effort.    (01)

If we do get some constructive discussion that would be appropriate to
include in a summary of such a proposal, I will create a Wiki for that
purpose, and a pointer from the existing page.  Anyone else is free to
create a page for that purpose, but I would like to see what kind of
discussion we get before deciding whether it needs a wiki to ingest.    (02)

Pat    (03)

Patrick Cassidy
cell: 908-565-4053
cassidy@xxxxxxxxx    (04)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Wheeler
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:16 AM
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology
> Can you put this on the wiki so that it can be worked on
> collaboratively.
> As it gets fleshed out perhaps it might grow into an entire section
> with
> multiple pages. I would suggest that the content below is already 3
> pages (Intro, Motivation and Goals/Process) and could be 4 very easily.
> I admit to being personally sceptical but I think that if we are going
> to discuss this, let us at least do it in a professional way with
> detailed plans and concrete objections/issues recorded in a
> dispassionate fashion.
> This is a good start and I hope that we can all treat it as a serious
> point of view deserving serious effort both in raising issues and in
> solving them.
> Ron
>     (05)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>