PS - I'm not sure about where this idea of a mental model of
an ontology
came from. I never mentioned it, and I certainly don't have an ontology in
my head. Of course the ontology has to be represented in some way - CL,
RDFS, OWL, UML, EXPRESS, arse-barcodes, who cares ?
What is this thing that is in common between al these
different file formats? Where is it, if not in your head? This is rather
like the old chestnut of saying what exactly a program is, if you can write the
'same' program in several wildly different programming languages. For example,
quicksort can be implemented in just about any programming language, and its
still quicksort. In CS we have the useful distinction between algorithm and
program, maybe we need a similar terminological distinction for ontologies. Any
suggestions?
[MW] Ok. So is the quicksort program in your head the same as
the quicksort program in my head (I even remember writing one once in Basic)?
Talking about what is in someone’s head just doesn’t cut it I’m
afraid. It is at best a loose way of talking. Where you have several things
that have something in common, what you do have is an abstraction, and my extensional
analysis would make that a class. So if I have 5 copies of the same content,
there is a class that represents the pattern that is common to those 5 files.
And if I have the “same” ontology that is represented in different
languages, then there is a class that represents that sameness.
Regards
Matthew
West
Information Junction
Tel: +44 560 302 3685
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered
in England and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.