[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Next steps in using ontologies as standards

To: edbark@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:13:42 +0100
Message-id: <49639F56.9060709@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Ed Barkmeyer wrote:
> My gut skepticism is based on published experience.  My apologies for 
> failing to mention more than the biological work and the conflicting 
> standard upper ontologies.  With a bit of effort, I can find a few 
> others.  But my mathematical training tells me one counterexample 
> disproves a theorem.
>       (01)

if the theorem is 'any well-founded community of great minds will find
one model they can all agree on', then yes.  if the theorem is 'it is
possible for some well-founded community of great minds to find one
model they can all agree on', then no.    (02)

vQ    (03)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>