This mail is publicly posted to a distribution list as part
of a process of public discussion, any automatically generated statements to the
contrary non-withstanding. It is the opinion of the author, and does not
represent an official company view.
A wide
variety of schedules depend on two independent variables - e.g. change
oil every 10,000 miles or six months - so do we need a 5-D
system?
Sean Barker
BAE SYSTEMS - Advanced Technology
Centre
Bristol, UK
+44(0) 117 302 8184
BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace
Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales
No: 1996687
I'd like to hear any arguments to the
contrary, but I doubt that
a strong case can be made that a 4D ontology
is a requirement for
those applications.
Probably not for simple schedules, indeed. But for a maintenance
scheduler you might well need it, when parts need to be checked according to
the time they have have been in actual use, for example. Im sure Matthew has
examples.
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
|
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|