On Feb 7, 2008 4:26 PM, <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rob
>
> glad you like the ideas,
>
> About dynamic hierarchy, yes too, in the same way. We need to be able
> to insert new 'classters' as the knowledge boundaries may need to be
> shifted around
>
> I think the degree to which a hierarchy should be 'fixed' should be
> user defined, and by that I don't mean that individual users within a
> team adjust their own hierarchy to their personal taste (that would
> result in an incoherent model) I mean that depending on the task at
> hand, a hierarchy should be more or less fixable or a purpose for a
> given time.
>
> Was there a specific problem being addressed? (01)
Finding structure in natural language. (02)
I like your emphasis on "clusters", and the idea of finding such
dynamically. But I would rather find any structure automatically and
not get involved in a lot of user definition. (03)
And an incoherent (random?) overall structure would not bother me. I
expect it. (I think it might let the same text store more
information.) (04)
-Rob (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|