Re: [ontolog-forum] Time representation

[Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>]

At 12:14 PM -0800 1/22/08, Duane Nickull wrote:
>The OWL-time ontology agrees.    (01)

...    (02)

>It does not talk about precision.  IMO - precision is best described in a
>mid level or domain specific ontology so it can be meaningful and suitable
>for its purposes.    (03)

Precision is a very complex and tricky topic. I once tried to tackle 
an ontology for it, but just boning up on what engineers say about it 
left me gasping.    (04)

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC            (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                        (850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (05)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)