[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Time representation

To: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum] edbark@xxxxxxxx," <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:07:32 -0600
Message-id: <p06230915c3bc0b398177@[]>
At 12:14 PM -0800 1/22/08, Duane Nickull wrote:
>The OWL-time ontology agrees.    (01)

...    (02)

>It does not talk about precision.  IMO - precision is best described in a
>mid level or domain specific ontology so it can be meaningful and suitable
>for its purposes.    (03)

Precision is a very complex and tricky topic. I once tried to tackle 
an ontology for it, but just boning up on what engineers say about it 
left me gasping.    (04)

IHMC            (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                        (850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (05)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>