To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 19 May 2007 01:24:52 +0700 |
Message-id: | <c09b00eb0705181124u34e77398w8bc0f5827b5ffa8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Dear Ken thanks for your useful analysis, I particularly agree with some of your statements and some comments below
I like this description of truth. So what you are saying is that 'absolute truth' does not exist, only a relative value based on its assertion? are you saying that truth does not exist if it is not asserted as such, ie not expressed with language or symbol? if so, can the same be said of reality? Ie, that reality is defined by the point of view of its observer?
Tat Sat in Sanskrit.(what is=absolute truth) But we have to define reality for some practical purpose, like writing a chapter , or giving a lecture or designing a system etc. 'what is' must be defined a bit more narrowly
I agree that in general terms, making statements about reality can become highly speculative. However my statement 'reality is what is true' is indeed related to the need to make a declaration about a system. whithin the system what is true should be modelled In an ontology, when something is true is part of the reality and should not be ignored
yes, thats what I mean The question of whether the representations must be consciously perceived
or only phenomenologically functional takes the question to another level.
Animals respond on the basis of representations of reality in their brains that
could be said to have a level of truth or falseness - in fact, representations
that have meaningful falseness would be selected against.
This is the next interesting point. Our ability to perceive determines what we consider true or false,
Yes. I dont think human brain is designed to grasp absolute truth in its completeness, as our physical and neurological constraints allow us only to process a given number of signals, thus showing that we can only see part of the picture at any given time
yes cheers PDM
-- Paola Di Maio**** Lecturer and Researcher School of Information Technology Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai Thailand ********************************************* _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, KCliffer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, Waclaw Kusnierczyk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, KCliffer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] {Disarmed} Reality and Truth, Deborah MacPherson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |